Tag: interview

In the intricate world of operating systems, scheduling algorithms are pivotal in managing how processes are allocated to the CPU for execution. These algorithms are designed to optimize various performance metrics such as CPU utilization, throughput, waiting time, and turnaround time. Let’s delve into the details of some common scheduling algorithms and understand their significance. 1. First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) Overview The First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) scheduling algorithm is one of the simplest types of CPU scheduling. As the name suggests, processes are executed in the order they arrive in the ready queue. Characteristics Non-preemptive: Once a process starts its execution, it runs to completion. Implementation: Typically managed with a FIFO (First-In-First-Out) queue. Pros Simple and easy to understand and implement. Fair in the sense that each process gets its turn. Cons Can lead to the "convoy effect," where shorter processes are delayed by longer ones. Poor performance for time-sharing systems due to high waiting times. Example Consider three processes arriving at different times with varying burst times: Process P1: Arrival Time = 0 ms, Burst Time = 5 ms Process P2: Arrival Time = 1 ms, Burst Time = 3 ms Process P3: Arrival Time = 2 ms, Burst Time = 8 ms The order of execution will be P1 → P2 → P3, regardless of their burst times. 2. Shortest Job Next (SJN) Overview Shortest Job Next (SJN), also known as Shortest Job First (SJF), selects the process with the smallest burst time for execution next. Characteristics Non-preemptive: Once a process starts, it runs to completion. Implementation: Requires knowledge of burst times beforehand, which is not always possible. Pros Minimizes average waiting time. Efficient for batch processing systems. Cons Difficult to predict burst times accurately. Can lead to "starvation" if shorter processes keep arriving. Example Using the same processes as above but sorted by burst time: Process P2: Burst Time = 3 ms Process P1: Burst Time = 5 ms Process P3: Burst Time = 8 ms The order of execution will be P2 → P1 → P3. 3. Priority Scheduling Overview Priority Scheduling assigns a priority to each process, and the CPU is allocated to the process with the highest priority. Characteristics Preemptive or Non-preemptive: Can be implemented in both ways. Implementation: Processes are placed in a priority queue. Pros Ensures critical processes receive immediate CPU attention. Cons Can lead to "starvation" of lower-priority processes. Requires careful assignment of priorities to avoid biases. Example Consider three processes with assigned priorities (higher number = higher priority): Process P1: Priority = 2 Process P2: Priority = 3 Process P3: Priority = 1 The order of execution will be P2 → P1 → P3. 4. Round Robin (RR) Overview Round Robin (RR) scheduling assigns a fixed time quantum to each process in the ready queue in a cyclic order. Characteristics Preemptive: Each process is allowed to run for a maximum of one time quantum. Implementation: Processes are placed in a circular queue. Pros Fair time allocation among processes. Good for time-sharing systems. Cons Context switching overhead can be high if the time quantum is too small. Performance can degrade if the time quantum is too large. Example Consider three processes with a time quantum of 2 ms: Process P1: Burst Time = 5 ms Process P2: Burst Time = 3 ms Process P3: Burst Time = 8 ms The order of execution will be P1 (2 ms) → P2 (2 ms) → P3 (2 ms) → P1 (3 ms) → P2 (1 ms) → P3 (6 ms). 5. Multilevel Queue Scheduling Overview Multilevel Queue Scheduling divides processes into different queues based on their priority or type. Each queue can have its own scheduling algorithm. Characteristics Preemptive or Non-preemptive: Can be implemented in both ways. Implementation: Processes are assigned to different queues permanently. Pros Flexibility in managing different types of processes. Efficient for systems with diverse workload types. Cons Fixed assignment of processes to queues can be inflexible. Lower-priority queues may suffer from starvation. Example Consider two queues: System Processes (high priority, Round Robin) User Processes (low priority, FCFS) System processes will always be executed before user processes. 6. Multilevel Feedback Queue (MLFQ) Overview Multilevel Feedback Queue (MLFQ) is a dynamic scheduling algorithm that allows processes to move between queues based on their behavior and execution history. Characteristics Preemptive: Processes can be preempted based on dynamic criteria. Implementation: Multiple queues with different scheduling algorithms, allowing process migration. Pros Adapts to varying process needs. Prevents starvation by aging processes. Cons Complex to implement and manage. Requires fine-tuning of parameters for optimal performance. Example Consider three queues with different time quantums: Queue 1: Time Quantum = 2 ms Queue 2: Time Quantum = 4 ms Queue 3: FCFS A process starts in Queue 1 and moves to lower-priority queues if it exceeds the time quantum. Conclusion Understanding scheduling algorithms is fundamental to optimizing CPU performance and ensuring efficient process management in operating systems. Each algorithm has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of algorithm depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the system. Whether it's the simplicity of FCFS, the efficiency of SJN, or the flexibility of MLFQ, scheduling algorithms are the backbone of modern operating systems, ensuring that every process gets its fair share of CPU time.

Tag: interview

Demystifying Scheduling Algorithms in Operating Systems

Quick Links

Quick Links

Social Media

Quick Links

Quick Links

Social Media

Hi Instagram Fam! Get a FREE Cheat Sheet on System Design.

Hi LinkedIn Fam! Get a FREE Cheat Sheet on System Design

Loved Our YouTube Videos? Get a FREE Cheat Sheet on System Design.

Hi Instagram Fam!
Get a FREE Cheat Sheet on System Design.

Hi LinkedIn Fam!
Get a FREE Cheat Sheet on System Design